|
Please visit the LangaList Home Page Please note: Older issues may contain information that is now out of date How To
Subscribe and Unsubscribe is at the end of this
note. Mailing List Trouble? See
http://langa.com/help.htm Please recommend the LangaList to a friend! (And maybe win a prize!) An easier-to read formatted
HTML version of this newsletter is available The
LangaList 2005-06-23 Please visit our sponsors and help keep the LangaList S.E. free!
--- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList S.E. Free! ) --- Graduations, Weddings, and More! --------------( the above is an advertisement )-------------- 1) Looks Strong, But Don't Be Fooled!At a quick glance, ")qWw@o$d" looks like a pretty good password, but it's actually not. It's just the word "password" with the keys shifted up one row and to the left as it's typed; and alternating between Caps On and Caps Off for the characters. A computer can crack that password almost instantly, and yet many people use that simple trick (or others just as easy to defeat) in the false belief that they're safe. A less obvious word might look harder--- for example, "%9&dYw%9H3" is simply the word "touchstone" disguised the same way. But again, a computer will rip through that password in an eye blink. And even if your passwords once were safe, they may not be today: Passwords that were fine even just a few years ago may now be vulnerable to attack because of huge advances in hardware and software. For example, the password "ChEcK12" meets many of the criteria for safe passwords that were recommended only 2-3 years ago, and yet in one recent demonstration, a lowly 500MHz P3 PC running a widely-available cracking tool was able to guess that password in only 26 seconds; and today's top-of-the-line PCs could perform the same crack almost instantly. But it's not hard to create and use
passwords that really *are* strong and hard to crack, and yet also are easy to use and
remember. I've pulled together a collection of FREE and low-cost tools and tips
over at Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---
--------------( the above is an advertisement )------------- 2) Wants To Mass-Email (Not Spam) A Group
Yup--- vanilla email is hideously unreliable. (See http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=17300016 ). And Incredimail--- with its unbelievably bloated formatting--- has its own problems. (See items 6 and 7 in this issue http://langa.com/newsletters/2002/2002-10-10.htm ) As for mailing services: Many web hosts offer the "Mailman" list mailer as part of their base hosting deal--- often as little as $5-$10 a month. Mailman is free software ( http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/ ) and pretty good for lists of a modest size. There are other, similar small-to-moderate list mailers available at other web hosts, too. If you don't have or don't want a web presence, "Yahoo Groups" ( http://groups.yahoo.com/ ) is free and works OK for low-volume mailings (it's really a hobbyist and special-interest kind of service). But you have to register, and there are some, um, less-savory portions of the Groups that may be a problem for business mailings. MSN has a similar "groups" service, too, with very similar strengths and weaknesses. The current best commercial service I know for plain-text mailings is http://listbox.com/ , run by the same folks who run pobox.com. They're aggressively anti-spam, and the service is reliable and downright cheap. The best service I know for formatted mails and high-volume (e.g. large) mailing lists is http://www.dundee.net/isp/email.htm . There are many others too ( http://www.google.com/search?q=free+mailing+list+software ) but the ones above are the ones I personally know of and use. Click to email this item to a
friend 3) Bblluurryy Tteexxtt
Every flat panel screen has a design resolution--- an intended setting--- usually listed in the owner's manual. At that specific resolution, standard fonts "fit" the pixel size and spacing best. But at other resolutions, the font design may call for a stroke width the screen simply cannot display. For example, a screen can draw the downstroke of the letter "I" one pixel wide, two pixels wide, three pixels wide (etc); and it'll look fine that way. But a pixel is a pixel: There's no smaller display unit available. That means a display can't really draw the downstroke of an "I" at (say) 1.25 pixels wide, or 2.33 pixels wide, even if the font's mathematic design calls for that. For all the non-whole-number, in-between pixel sizes, the video card, driver software and monitor literally have to fake it! The result can be blurry, funky-looking text... and eyestrain headaches, especially because flat panel pixels (more so than CRT pixels) can be quite obvious and distinct--- like standing too close to a pointillist painting. Your best bet is to start with the hardware: Find the optimum resolution and/or default settings for your screen, and use that as a baseline. What you see at the default settings and resolution probably is the best your screen can do on its own. (We'll get to software assists in a moment.) Look closely at the on-screen text (especially "serif" fonts like Times Roman, with little finishing strokes at the ends of letters) to see how the screen is drawing the characters. This is your touchstone for "as good as the hardware can do on its own." I think you'll find that your system's native and best resolution is not 1400/1000 (that's not even a standard resolution anyway, to my knowledge): My previous laptop had a 14" screen, and I usually ran it at 1024x768; it was fine at that resolution. My newer laptop has a 15.4" screen, and I run that at 1280x800. My laptop doesn't even offer 14/10 as an option; a 14/10 resolution would be hard to see even on many full-sized desktop monitors, never mind a relatively modest 14" laptop screen. I'm not sure what your setup is, but in any case, a lower resolution will probably give you a much better starting point for legible text. Once you've found a resolution that's at least approximately OK for your eyes, add in the software tweaks that can improve display quality. Your laptop or monitor may have come with such software; or if you're using XP, try Microsoft's free "Cleartype." (See http://www.microsoft.com/typography/ClearTypeInfo.mspx ) Cleartype is basically just a better way of using software to "fake" the curves, slants, and inter-pixel sizes of on-screen text, especially on flat screens, and it can dramatically improve text legibility. You can enable and disable Cleartype by right-clicking on the desktop, selecting Properties/Appearance/Effects/"Use the following method to smooth edges of screen fonts" and selecting Cleartype. The Cleartype settings themselves are also adjustable, so you can tweak until you find a combination of resolution and legibility that best suits your needs. Microsoft has a free Cleartype tweaking tool available at http://www.microsoft.com/typography/cleartype/tuner/Step1.aspx , and there's also a free third-party tool available at http://www.ioisland.com/cleartweak/ . Flat screens have a lot going for them, and some are very, very good. But alas, I've never seen any flat panel that's as clear and easy on the eyes as a high-quality CRT. It may happen some day, but I don't think we're there yet. So, in the meantime, let your hardware work in its "natural" modes, and use software (like Cleartype) to assist in displaying a font's smooth lines, slopes and curves on what is essentially a fixed, rectilinear grid of pixels. "Faking it" is the name of the game! <g> Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---
--------------( the above is an advertisement )------------- 4) ISP Security Tools (E.G. AOL's) OK?Fred, I've poked through your archives looking for information about AOL - which many of my friends use and often ask me questions about it. I don't use it and so generally just say "don't know". One recurring question is about how 'self protected' AOL is and so, how necessary is third party software (Spybot, Ad-Aware, MS AntiSpyware, Spyware Blaster, etc.) to protect it? In a similar way, is a third party firewall needed and antivirus software? AOL projects this image of taking care of it all and being 'safe'. Any ideas or experience about this? Thanks, Bill Zaydak
Oh, jeez---- if anything, AOL members need more
protection than others! Although some AOL users are quite sophisticated, AOL as
a whole tends to attract (and is advertised to) relative novice users. These are
people who are especially vulnerable to all kinds of hack attacks and scams---
not because they're bad people or anything like that--- but simply because they
don't yet know any better. In general, as soon as an AOL user reaches the point of asking "are these tools any good?" I feel they're ready to start taking control of their own online experience. I'll then (gently) recommend they get their own security tools, and maybe explore a standard ISP, which will get them to the internet for less money and without all the extra baggage and intermediation that AOL imposes on its users. Some people really like AOL, and that's perfectly fine. I just like to make sure that people stay with AOL as a conscious choice, and not because they weren't aware of alternatives. But in any case, yes, AOL users need full software protection, regardless of what AOL says or is doing. If your AOL friends can handle it, you'd be doing them a favor to set them up with a good collection of security tools, such as those you mention. Click to email this item to a
friend 5) Salvaging A Semi-Clean Setup From OEM Discs
If the vendor can supply you with a plain-vanilla setup cd (like the retail version), or otherwise get you unaltered setup files, then you can use Windows' normal setup options and achieve the clean setup you want. But more likely, you're locked into whatever is already on the restore disk: The OEM Restore disk usually simply puts back the original factory setup, with all the excess baggage that usually entails, as determined by the vendor when he set up the original customized installation. Depending on exactly how things are set up on your restore
DVD and system, you may be able to override the original custom
install settings, but it's a long shot. If you want to explore this, the sites
here will tell you all you need to know about "unattended installation"
settings: So, what do you do if it simply isn't possible to
achieve a truly clean, 100%
from-scratch installation? It takes a few steps, but you
actually can get fairly close to clean: Just as you thought, the first step is
to start
with the factory image, and then use Control Panel's Add/Remove Software applet to
strip out what you don't want. Some items may have their own uninstall function,
which you can also use. Run a Registry Tool to catch and correct any errors or orphaned entries in the Registry, left over from the many file deletions and uninstalls you just performed. Don't be alarmed if there's a ton of 'em--- and there probably will be. Just let the Registry tool of your choice correct what it can. For suggestions on Registry cleaners, see http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-q=clean+registry+&sp-a=0008002a-sp00000000 and http://www.google.com/search?q=clean+registry . Plus! subscribers can find additional options in #11 in http://www.langalist.com/plus/newsletters/2005/2005-04-18plus.asp Next, tweak Windows' settings, paying special attention to space-hogs like the Recycle Bin, System Restore, and the browser cache. More info: http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=12803122 Run Defrag several times until the files are as compact and contiguous as possible. Set up the system to clean, defrag, and otherwise maintain itself, as much as possible. See http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=16100473 When the setup is as lean, clean and pristine as you can make it, burn an image of the setup, or at least make a full backup. Store this image or backup in a safe place, away from the PC: You'll only use this copy if you ever need to roll your system back to the like-new condition it's now in. This approach can work, and can give you a pretty good setup. But it's usually still not as clean or lean as a truly from-scratch setup, so it's not the preferred approach unless there's no alternative. But if your system vendor has left you without an alternative, this delete-and-clean approach can still serve you pretty well. Click to email this item to a
friend 6) Last Week To "Recommend And Win!"On June 30, I'll choose three more monthly winners of a
FREE ONE YEAR SUBSCRIPTION to the LangaList Plus! edition. (If your name is
drawn and you're already a Plus! subscriber, your current subscription will be
extended by a full year.) Click to email this item to a
friend 7) CDs vs DVDs
When the backup article was originally written, DVDs were still ridiculously expensive. That's changed, of course. I now use both kinds of media. My daily backups currently run about 500MB, compressed, which fits nicely on a single CD with some room to spare. It'd be wasteful to use a whole DVD for that. But my weekly full backups (actually, these are images of my C: partition) occupy about 6GB compressed, and fit comfortably on two DVDs. To me, it's just a matter of using the medium that more or less fits the size of the data files you're trying to preserve. But, to tell you the truth, the medium matters much less than the act of making the backup: DVD, CD, floppy, punch card, clay tablet or pictures on the cave wall--- whatever works is fine, as long as you regularly make full backups <g>. *Which* backup is just a matter of convenience and budget. The key thing is to *make backups,* no matter how! Click to email this item to a
friend 8) They Loaded The CodeDo you have a home page or website? (It doesn't matter
what size.) Please click over to
http://langa.com/code.htm , and maybe you can join the hundreds and hundreds
of LangaList readers who have "Loaded the Code!" (If you've already "Loaded The
Code" and are wondering if your site will appear here or on the Langa.Com web
site, please see Manually Browse All Posted-to-Date Sites Starting At The Other Casualty Of War stollerusa ezboard forums Camelot Online DigitalBreak Web Hosting Genealogy (AU) Oleh Sayang Sobby Bookkeeping & Web Design Computer Services by Justin Bennett PECOMail Pocono Graphic Design Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---
--------------( the above is an advertisement )------------- 9) ScreenHunterWriting in reference to "mwsnap" in "Simple, Easy, Freeware Screenshot Tool" ( http://langa.com/newsletters/2005/2005-03-21.htm#9 ) reader Jeff Partridge says:
Thanks, Jeff. ScreenHunter comes in three flavors, starting with a free basic version, and extending to a $30 "Pro" version. Click to email this item to a
friend 10) Just For Grins
Now that *is* cool! <g> Click to email this item to a
friend --- ( Your Clicks On Ad Links Help Keep The LangaList Free! ) ---
--------------( the above is an advertisement )------------- 11) Plus! Edition Highlights:Today's LangaList Plus! Edition contains all ten items above, plus about 30% more content including:
Plus! Edition info: http://langa.com/plus.htm Click to email this item to a
friend (Give a gift subscription to
the LangaList Plus edition! The LangaList is published about 72 times a year, or about 6 times a month. See you next issue, 2005-06-27! Best, An easier-to read formatted HTML version is available in the "Current Issue" section of http://langa.com. (The HTML version of each issue normally is available by 9AM EST [UT-5] of the issue date.) All past LangaList issues are also available at the Langa.Com site. UNSUBSCRIBE (instant removal!):
http://langa.com/leave_langalist.htm CHANGE ADDRESS? LIST TROUBLE? HAVE QUESTIONS? OTHER PROBLEM? NEED HELP? See http://langa.com/help.htm This newsletter is SPAM PROOF and requires two levels of subscriber confirmation
before delivery begins: See
http://langa.com/info.htm |
|
|
Please visit the LangaList Home Page |